Skip to content

Alternative materials

Mycelium (mushroom) foam

Agricultural waste bound together by fungal mycelium and grown in moulds; a home-compostable replacement for polystyrene (EPS) and polyethylene (EPE) foam packaging inserts.

Maturity
Commercial at scale
What it replaces
Polystyrene (EPS) and polyethylene (EPE) foam packaging inserts, moulded foam corners, coolers, insulation panels
End of life
Home compostable, Industrially compostable
Cost versus plastic
Up to 1.5×
Drawbacks and greenwashing risks
Heavier than EPS so transport emissions rise; slow grow cycle; moisture sensitive; only suits cushioning geometries; cost-competitiveness claim is vendor-sourced and EPS is still cheaper at mass scale.
Verified on
22 September 2026

Mycelium packaging is made by packing hemp hurd or wood chips into a mould, letting fungal mycelium grow through it for about a week, then heat-drying it to stop growth. The result is a rigid, cushioning foam shaped to the product.

It replaces expanded polystyrene (EPS) and polyethylene foam inserts, coolers and insulation panels. Ecovative (US) developed the MycoComposite process and licenses it to regional growers under the Mushroom Packaging brand, so material can be grown near the point of use. Dell has shipped servers in mycelium since 2011 and IKEA has removed EPS from all its flat packs, cutting about 8,000 tonnes of EPS a year using fibre, cardboard and mycelium alternatives.

A peer-reviewed life-cycle assessment (LCA) (Zoungrana, Hausner and Yuan, Discover Sustainability, 2025) modelled packaging for a 32-inch television and found 1.32 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) for mycelium against 3.35 kg CO2e for EPS, with mycelium winning in most impact categories. Its higher density raises transport emissions, which is the main category where it loses. It is home compostable and breaks down in soil within weeks.

Drawbacks: heavier than EPS; a 7 to 10 day grow cycle; sensitive to moisture and humidity; limited to protective and cushioning shapes; not suitable for wet food contact. Cost: the vendor says it is cost-competitive with petroleum foam, but independent trade analysis says EPS is still cheaper per unit at mass scale, with local growing reducing the freight penalty.

Sources last verified 22 September 2026. Page updated 24 September 2026. How we check sources