Skip to content

Evidence library

World Health Organization (WHO): microplastic exposure is real, evidence of harm in humans is still limited

The World Health Organization’s cautious 2022 review says people are exposed to plastic particles but data on health effects remain scarce.

Authors / organisation
World Health Organization
Year
2022
Journal or publisher
WHO
Study type
Narrative review
Evidence strength
Evidence: High
Sample / scope
Literature review of dietary and inhalation exposure
Key finding
Exposure to micro- and nanoplastics is widespread, but limited data provide little evidence of adverse effects in humans; exposure should nonetheless be reduced.
Headline number
Evidence of human harm rated 'limited'
Caveats / how it is misquoted
Pre-dates the 2024 NEJM plaque study and the 2025–2026 brain studies.
Open access
Yes
Verified on
22 September 2026

The World Health Organization reviewed the evidence on human exposure to micro- and nanoplastics through food, water and air, and on what is known about their effects.

It concluded that exposure is widespread but that limited data provide little evidence that micro- and nanoplastics have adverse effects in humans. At the same time it recommended that measures be taken to reduce exposure, and called for better measurement methods and more research.

The report is useful for balance: it represents the official, conservative scientific position and reminds readers that finding plastic in the body is not the same as proving harm.

It was published before several major later studies, including the 2024 NEJM artery-plaque study and the 2025–2026 brain studies, so its conclusions do not reflect the most recent evidence.

Sources last verified 22 September 2026. Page updated 23 September 2026. How we check sources