Skip to content

Evidence library

Returnable bottles cost 6–10% less than single-use once reuse runs at scale

Ellen MacArthur Foundation modelling with Systemiq and Eunomia found returnable drink and personal-care bottles cheaper per use than single-use in a shared, national system, and 28% cheaper for drinks once a plastic tax and a higher carbon price are added.

Authors / organisation
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, with Systemiq and Eunomia
Year
2023
Journal or publisher
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (report)
Study type
Model / projection
Evidence strength
Evidence: Medium
Sample / scope
Modelled total cost per use of returnable versus single-use packaging, French data, 'System Change' scenario
Key finding
At scale, returnable plastic drink bottles cost 6% less per use than single-use and personal-care bottles 10% less; with a plastic tax and a higher carbon price, returnable drink bottles are 28% cheaper (modelled).
Headline number
6–10% lower cost per use for returnable bottles at scale
Caveats / how it is misquoted
Modelled, not measured, and based on French data. Only holds for shared, large-scale systems with high return rates; fresh-food returnables were about 25% more expensive. Industry partners contributed.
Open access
Yes
Verified on
23 September 2026

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation, working with Systemiq, Eunomia and more than 60 organisations including Danone, Nestlé, PepsiCo, Coca-Cola and Unilever, modelled the full cost of returnable packaging in France: containers, washing, collection and transport back to be refilled.

In a well-designed system with shared infrastructure, standard containers and high return rates, the total cost per use of returnable plastic drink bottles was 6% lower than single-use, and returnable personal-care bottles 10% lower. With a plastic tax (€800 a tonne) and a carbon price rising from €45 to €100 a tonne added, returnable drink bottles came out 28% cheaper per use; packaging fees for drink bottles were assumed to stay the same. Emissions and water use also fell by 35 to 70 percent.

The report is just as clear about the limits: fragmented or small-scale schemes are unlikely to become as cheap as single-use, and returnables for fresh food and food-cupboard products were about 25% more expensive unless income from unreturned deposits is counted.

Why it matters: reuse pays when it is shared and scaled. For a single company, the practical route is joining a pooled scheme rather than building one alone.

Sources last verified 23 September 2026. Page updated 24 September 2026. How we check sources